CFOs We are Implementing AI Backwards
18 March 2026

CFOs We are Implementing AI Backwards

SaaS Metrics School

About

Are finance teams implementing AI the wrong way?


In episode #359, Ben Murray argues that many CFOs and finance leaders are approaching AI backward—focusing too much on prompts and quick wins rather than building the foundational data infrastructure required for meaningful, repeatable insights.


Drawing from recent AI webinars and his experience building softwaremetrics.ai, Ben explains why SaaS metrics, retention, and cohort analysis should not rely on AI. Instead, these should be computed through structured, deterministic systems first—then enhanced with AI for deeper analysis and pattern recognition.


Resources Mentioned



    My new metrics engine: https://softwaremetrics.ai/
    My SaaSpocalypse post: https://www.thesaascfo.com/the-saaspocalypse-ai-agents-vibe-coding-and-the-changing-economics-of-saas/

What You’ll Learn



    Why prompt-driven AI workflows are not scalable in finance
    The difference between deterministic systems and AI-driven analysis
    Why you don’t need AI to calculate core SaaS metrics like retention or CAC payback
    The importance of structured data and clean data pipelines
    How AI should be layered on top of computed financial data—not raw inputs
    Why context windows and token usage matter when working with large datasets
    How AI can uncover insights (like expansion opportunities) that FP&A teams may miss

Why It Matters



    Prompt-based workflows create inconsistency and lack of auditability
    Without structured data, AI outputs are unreliable and not repeatable
    Finance teams risk “prompt fatigue” without building scalable systems
    Deterministic calculations ensure accuracy for critical SaaS metrics and reporting
    AI delivers the most value when used for analysis—not basic computation
    Efficient data handling reduces token costs and improves performance