Gaza's Maternal Healthcare Crisis
12 November 2025

Gaza's Maternal Healthcare Crisis

Guilford College Public Health

About

Global Health Problem: How does the destruction of hospital infrastructure impact healthcare

access for mothers giving birth and their newborn children in Gaza?

*intro music*

[Narration]

Many women in Gaza go into labor with no hospitals or doctors nearby to safely deliver their

baby. Without any access to proper prenatal care, their baby is at risk of being born prematurely.

[Shatha Elnakib]

These women are just under unimaginable, unfathomable stress because of the, you know, the

impossible conditions they're living under.

*music*

[Narration]

To understand why Gaza’s healthcare system is in ruins we need to go back seven decades.

The roots of this problem date back to 1948, when hundreds of thousands of Palestinians were

displaced from their homes during the Nakba with many seeking refuge in what is now known

as the Gaza Strip. This mass displacement was recognized by the United Nations, which in its

Resolution 194, called for the right of return for Palestinian refugees displaced during that time.

The displacement of the Palestinians continued, along with continuous airstrikes over the next

seven decades, leaving Gaza’s healthcare system in shambles. In 2007, Israel and Egypt

imposed a blockade on Gaza which severely restricted the movement of the people, goods and

supplies which included medical supplies. This blockade has made it nearly impossible for

hospitals to continue functioning as usual. This blockade on Gaza is still in place meaning

limited medical supplies and other resources.

[Shatha Elnakib]

Israel decided to stop aid in Gaza with the end of the ceasefire. And so this is what we call

weaponization of humanitarian aid using humanitarian aid, which is not supposed to be a

weapon, but using it as a weapon against people. Telling people you have to acquiesce to our

political demands in order for you to get your humanitarian aid. So this–we're seeing this play

out. And of course this is not normal. It is not legal. It is very much a war crime to prevent

civilians from having access to humanitarian aid.


[Narration]

That’s how Dr. Shatha Elnakib, an Assistant Scientist at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of

Public Health, describes the situation with regards to aid in Gaza. Dr. Elnakib has researched

the crisis in Gaza specifically how it affects pregnant women. In an article for The Lancet, she


writes about the harsh conditions for pregnant women in Gaza and her research reveals the

severe lack of maternal healthcare.

*music*

[Narration]

With hospitals already struggling under years of blockade and bombardment, this weaponization

of humanitarian aid only worsens the crisis. Medical facilities that once provided essential care

are now barely functioning and nearly two thirds of them have shut down completely. Only 39%

of hospitals in Gaza are still partially functioning.

[Shatha Elnakib]

Once they get to the facility, facilities tend to be overcrowded. They tend to also be understaffed

because healthcare workers are unable to get to the facility the same way that these women

can't get to the facilities because of, you know, the destroyed roads...And so the priority

becomes to dealing with these mass casualties, these trauma injuries. Just you know, so you

know, according to the latest estimates we have around 112,000 people who have reported

injuries according to the WHO’s most recent situation or SitRep. And as you can imagine, these

are people who have burns who have complex trauma injuries. These are not simple injuries.

Right, because, you know, because of the nature of the war, because of the relentless

bombardment, the use of weapons that are, you know, quite cruel, white phosphorus included.

And so these people's needs are often so acute that they will take precedence over other things

like routine pregnancy care, for example, or antenatal care. And so the needs of women,

particularly pregnant women, then become deprioritized.

[Narration]

For pregnant women, this means barely any prenatal care, leading to more premature births,

low birth weights, and higher risks of infant mortality. In overcrowded and makeshift maternity

wards, doctors are forced to work with minimal resources. There are shortages in some of the

most basic medical supplies like gloves, gauze, and disinfectants which leads to many births

taking place in unsanitary conditions risking infections for both the mother and the newborn.

[Shatha Elnakib]

There's, you know, scarcity in oxygen. And statements from health providers themselves have

indicated that certain surgical procedures, including C-section, which is a very serious surgical

procedure, are now being conducted without anesthesia or women are being cut open without

any anesthetic. And at times, without even electricity, you must have read in the news how

doctors were using their telephone flashlights because there was no electricity in hospitals and

they were conducting these very advanced surgical procedures in the absence of electricity.

*music*

[Narration]


But the crisis in Gaza’s hospitals doesn’t end after the mothers give birth. Even when babies

survive birth, they face yet another challenge: a lack of electricity. Gaza has been in an ongoing

electricity crisis since October of 2023. According to the World Health Organization, as of 2023,

130 premature infants in Gaza rely on incubators and 61% of those incubators need electricity

to function. Without reliable electricity, life-saving equipment like these incubators are shut down

and so according to the United Nations, during this past winter alone eight newborns have died

of hypothermia. Infant mortality rates are one of the biggest indicators of a population’s overall

health. They reflect not only access to medical care, but the stability of infrastructure, and

access to other essential resources. But in Gaza, where hospitals are barely functioning, these

numbers don’t just signal a health crisis, they represent lives lost to conditions that should be

preventable.

*music*

[Narration]

At first, it might seem like this is an issue happening far away, with no direct connection to the

people in the United States. But in reality, U.S. taxpayer dollars directly fund the Israeli

military–its weapons, its airstrikes, and the destruction of infrastructure including hospitals in

Gaza. According to the U.S. Department of State, through the U.S. Foreign Military Financing

program, Israel has received some of the most advanced military equipment in the world.

According to USA Spending, a website run by the U.S. Department of Treasury, this program is

funded by U.S. federal revenue which is primarily taxpayer dollars meaning American citizens

are directly financing the military operations in Gaza. The Department of State also reports that

since Israel’s founding in 1948, the United States has provided Israel with over $130 billion in

direct aid. This financial and military support makes the U.S. more than just a bystander.

[Shatha Elnakib]

I think international pressure is very important and we have just, we have seen big hegemons,

big countries in the West failing to exert international pressure, you know, not just turning a blind

eye to what's happening, but rather, you know, they're very much complicit materially. So they

give the money, they give the weapons.

[Narration]

While there has been a lot of material support for Israel, efforts to aid Gaza have also been

made, though they face more obstacles that make the aid delivery process more difficult.

Humanitarian convoys, organized by international agencies like the United Nations and the Red

Cross, have managed to deliver resources, such as food, medical supplies and other essential

supplies despite the blockades and ongoing airstrikes. Temporary ceasefires including the most

recent one have allowed for the aid from these convoys to reach Gaza safely. The United

Nations Relief and Works Agency has set up field hospitals to provide medical care on the Gaza

Strip. In addition, organizations like Doctors Without Borders and Oxfam have also played a key

role in providing emergency medical care and essential services to the people in Gaza by also

setting up field hospitals, supporting the few functioning hospitals remaining in Gaza, and

operating mobile clinics. But beyond these humanitarian efforts, local governments and


individual countries are also taking action to address the conflict. The Oxford City Council has

recently voted to divest from Israel in support of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions

movement against Israel. South Africa has also been vocal in its support for Gaza, even taking

legal steps against Israel by bringing a case to the International Court of Justice, accusing Israel

of committing acts of genocide in Gaza. While these actions are different in terms of approach,

they both reflect a growing global movement pushing for accountability and consequences.

[Shatha Elnakib]

Beyond rebuilding hospitals, we need to make sure we have long term strategies that ensure

that healthcare remains protected and accessible. And we're not just talking about, you know,

let's rebuild and reconstruct, but how do we prevent this from happening?


[Narration]

Despite the growing global movement for accountability and the humanitarian aid efforts, these

alone cannot truly address the devastation in Gaza. International organizations such as UNICEF

and the WHO must not only fund the rebuilding of hospitals and ensure people have access to

medical supplies, but they must also support the training of local healthcare workers and equip

them so that they can continue operating hospitals effectively in Gaza. Long-term unrestricted

aid is crucial for rebuilding Gaza’s healthcare system, but true recovery won’t happen until a

permanent ceasefire is reached. Many ceasefires in the past have been fragile. For example,

the most recent ceasefire which took effect on January 19th of this year, was violated when

Israel resumed its attacks on Gaza. According to Amnesty International, this was a “unilateral

resumption” of the war meaning the attacks were one sided, and they resulted in the deaths of

at least 414 Palestinans including 174 children. This was a clear violation of the ceasefire

agreement and this is only one example of many where Israel has failed to honor such

agreements. Achieving a permanent ceasefire requires more than just a temporary pause in

violence; it requires strong diplomatic efforts that address the root causes of the conflict. This

includes pressing the international community to hold Israel accountable by ensuring that they

honor the terms of a permanent ceasefire. A first step would be the lifting of the blockades on

Gaza. Lifting the blockades would let aid reach Gaza without any obstacles. But for any peace

agreement to hold, the international community also has to ensure accountability for war crimes

and violations of the international law. While these are important steps towards a permanent

ceasefire, they would only be the beginning of a very long process.

[Shatha Elnakib]

We need better humanitarian diplomacy. We need international pressure to prevent attacks on

medical facilities everywhere, not just in Gaza. I mean we've seen in Syria, we've seen in

Ukraine how health facilities, health infrastructure is very much targeted as part of war tactics,

right? It’s part of the strategy of war. And that needs to stop...And it's not just obviously about,

you know. Rules of war around healthcare, but also rules of war against, you know, not

weaponizing food, not weaponizing water, not weaponizing aid. These are basic fundamentals.

Like I said, that are part of a rules based order that we have been living under for the last how


many years, 60 years more. And so we need to make sure that the rules based order, you know,

is back. And it's not just an anarchy and a jungle.

*music*

[Narration]

Gaza’s healthcare crisis is not just a humanitarian issue but also a moral and ethical one.

Hospitals shouldn’t be battlegrounds or places for airstrikes. The lives of pregnant women and

newborns shouldn’t be collateral damage during a so-called “war.” None of us choose the place

of our birth, yet for many, the circumstances of where they're born dictate whether they will

survive past their first year of life. As we continue to witness this ongoing crisis, we must ask

ourselves: What steps are we, as the global community, willing to take to ensure a future where

every life, regardless of the place of birth, has the opportunity to live without the constant threat

of violence and destruction to their healthcare and basic human rights?

*music*

[Narration]

This podcast was produced by Sarah Zaraf for the Spring 2025 Global Health Course at

Guilford College.