In this episode of The Backstory on the Shroud of Turin, Guy Powell interviews retired judge and longtime Shroud researcher David Belz.
David shares how his experience as a trial lawyer and judge shaped his approach to the Shroud of Turin. He explains how legal principles such as circumstantial evidence, corroboration, and “clear and convincing evidence” can be applied to the debate surrounding the cloth.
The discussion explores:
- Confirmation bias and skepticismThe relationship between faith and evidenceBilirubin findings in the bloodstainsScientific testing of the ShroudThe legal concept of cumulative evidenceHow the Shroud aligns with the Gospel accountsThe emotional power of the face imageWhy curiosity drives ongoing research
David also explains why science alone may never fully answer the question of authenticity. Instead, he argues that theology, science, and law each provide different paths toward truth.
This episode offers a powerful discussion about the Resurrection, Jesus Christ, and the evidence surrounding the Shroud of Turin. It also highlights themes explored in Guy Powell’s book, The Only Witness.